Are There Benefits to Applying PGRs to Cotton at or Near Cutout? (Collins, Edmisten, & Wells)

— Written By
en Español / em Português
Español

El inglés es el idioma de control de esta página. En la medida en que haya algún conflicto entre la traducción al inglés y la traducción, el inglés prevalece.

Al hacer clic en el enlace de traducción se activa un servicio de traducción gratuito para convertir la página al español. Al igual que con cualquier traducción por Internet, la conversión no es sensible al contexto y puede que no traduzca el texto en su significado original. NC State Extension no garantiza la exactitud del texto traducido. Por favor, tenga en cuenta que algunas aplicaciones y/o servicios pueden no funcionar como se espera cuando se traducen.


Português

Inglês é o idioma de controle desta página. Na medida que haja algum conflito entre o texto original em Inglês e a tradução, o Inglês prevalece.

Ao clicar no link de tradução, um serviço gratuito de tradução será ativado para converter a página para o Português. Como em qualquer tradução pela internet, a conversão não é sensivel ao contexto e pode não ocorrer a tradução para o significado orginal. O serviço de Extensão da Carolina do Norte (NC State Extension) não garante a exatidão do texto traduzido. Por favor, observe que algumas funções ou serviços podem não funcionar como esperado após a tradução.


English

English is the controlling language of this page. To the extent there is any conflict between the English text and the translation, English controls.

Clicking on the translation link activates a free translation service to convert the page to Spanish. As with any Internet translation, the conversion is not context-sensitive and may not translate the text to its original meaning. NC State Extension does not guarantee the accuracy of the translated text. Please note that some applications and/or services may not function as expected when translated.

Collapse ▲

We’ve been getting a number of questions this week regarding the utility of mepiquat-containing PGRs applied to cotton at or near cutout. This idea has been around quite a while, and it has been suggested that PGRs applied at cutout could:

  1. enhance upper boll maturity by diverting photosynthetic resources away from young terminal leaves, or regrowth, and towards boll development,
  2. promote leaf maturity to simplify defoliation, or enhance harvest aid efficacy
  3. reduce regrowth and trash in harvested lint
  4. promote earlier maturity
  5. reduce ginning costs
  6. potentially higher yields and improved fiber quality

There has been a lot of discussion around this subject and these claims over the years, and many of the points above are even suggested on some PGR labels.

This concept has been thoroughly investigated in NC as well as in GA through a multi-year and multi-environment research project conducted a few years ago (which will likely be published soon). In this study, we evaluated many of the points above, including defoliation, percent open bolls and nodes above cracked boll as a measure of maturity, number of bolls and boll retention, desiccation, terminal and basal regrowth, yields, and fiber quality.

In this study, we found no meaningful benefit to applying PGRs to cotton that had reached cutout. There was no evidence to support that defoliation could be improved nor regrowth reduced to the point that defoliation strategies could be modified, and more importantly, there was no advantage to cutout application in terms of yield or quality. Earlier applications of PGRs (prebloom, early bloom, etc) continue to be recommended in some situations depending on many factors, however the potential benefit of PGRs appears to erode beyond mid-bloom. This study also suggested that there is little to no penalty from such late-season PGR applications, other than the added expense of products and application costs, especially if applied alone.